Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872280›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Using AI to forecast student dropout risk in technical education using a learning analytics approach.

Olga Ovtšarenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Olga OvtšarenkoVilnius Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10223, Vilnius, Lithuania. olga.ovtsarenko@tktk.ee.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence and learning analytics in higher education creates new opportunities for adaptive curriculum design and evidence-based decision-making. This study investigates how predictive analytics can improve e-course development, detect early signs of students at risk of dropping out, and support timely pedagogical interventions. Using data from six CAD course logs delivered via Moodle at TTK University of Applied Sciences (Estonia) during the 2024–2025 academic year (99,104 activity records from 154 students), a machine learning model was developed to identify students at risk of academic failure. The proposed weighted attribute method combines key metrics—engagement, learning difficulty, and time allocation—to standardise behavioural and cognitive factors for outcome prediction. Logistic regression and decision tree classifiers were trained and assessed. The findings show that predictive models can identify at-risk students, allowing early alerts and adaptive support through ongoing monitoring. The framework turns learning analytics into actionable insights for educators, enabling proactive measures. The study concludes that AI-driven analytics, developed within ethical and pedagogically sound frameworks, can enhance transparency and foster equitable learning in higher education.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceHigher educationLearning analyticsMachine learningPredictive modelling

Identifiers

PMID41872280
PMCPMC13153170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.