ArticleScientific reports2026
Using AI to forecast student dropout risk in technical education using a learning analytics approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence and learning analytics in higher education creates new opportunities for adaptive curriculum design and evidence-based decision-making. This study investigates how predictive analytics can improve e-course development, detect early signs of students at risk of dropping out, and support timely pedagogical interventions. Using data from six CAD course logs delivered via Moodle at TTK University of Applied Sciences (Estonia) during the 2024–2025 academic year (99,104 activity records from 154 students), a machine learning model was developed to identify students at risk of academic failure. The proposed weighted attribute method combines key metrics—engagement, learning difficulty, and time allocation—to standardise behavioural and cognitive factors for outcome prediction. Logistic regression and decision tree classifiers were trained and assessed. The findings show that predictive models can identify at-risk students, allowing early alerts and adaptive support through ongoing monitoring. The framework turns learning analytics into actionable insights for educators, enabling proactive measures. The study concludes that AI-driven analytics, developed within ethical and pedagogically sound frameworks, can enhance transparency and foster equitable learning in higher education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.