ArticleScientific reports2026
Convolutional neural networks using preoperative CT to predict short-term recurrence after incisional hernia repair.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are deep neural networks that use convolutional layers to extract spatial features from data. The application of CNNs in assessment of postoperative outcomes of repair of incisional hernias demands further investigation. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of various CNNs to predict recurrence after incisional hernia repair. This was a single-center, retrospective study of patients who had undergone preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans prior to repair of incisional hernias. We trained three CNNs (ResNet-50, ResNet-152, and VGG16) to predict hernia recurrence after surgery. Images were batched into training versus test sets (training: test 4:1). The performance of the CNNs was assessed using conventional receiver operating characteristics curves and the areas under the curves. Gradient-weighted class activation maps were used to identify which regions were actively used in predicting hernia recurrence. The study cohort comprised 528 patients and 44,380 CT images. Among 528 patients (mean age 61.8 years, 62.9% female), 73 (13.8%) experienced recurrence at a mean follow-up of 17.3 months. The area under the curve was 0.840 (0.809–0.871) for ResNet-50; 0.743 (0.706–0.780) for ResNet-152; and 0.693 (0.654–0.732) for VGG16. ResNet-50 predicted incisional hernia recurrence better than ResNet-152 or VGG16 (P < 0.001, respectively). Image-based CNNs using routine, preoperative CT images were successful in predicting incisional hernia recurrence after repair. However, the clinical efficacies of the three CNNs varied. These differences require further clinical investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.