Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872066›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2026

Assessment of Initial Stay Time and Work-Rest Scheduling Over Consecutive Moderate-Intensity Workdays in Hot Environments in Young and Older Males and Females.

Glen P Kenny, Katie E Wagar, Roberto C Harris-Mostert, Kristina-Marie T Janetos, James J McCormick, Kelli E King, Leonidas G Ioannou, Ronald J Sigal, W Shane Journeay, Fergus K O'Connor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Glen P KennySchool of Human Kinetics, Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8683-6973
Katie E WagarSchool of Human Kinetics, Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Roberto C Harris-MostertSchool of Human Kinetics, Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kristina-Marie T JanetosSchool of Human Kinetics, Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
James J McCormickSchool of Human Kinetics, Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kelli E KingSchool of Human Kinetics, Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Leonidas G IoannouDepartment of Automatics, Biocybernetics and Robotics, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ronald J SigalSchool of Human Kinetics, Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
W Shane JourneayDepartments of Medicine and Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie. Medicine New Brunswick and Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.
Fergus K O'ConnorSchool of Allied Health, Sport and Social Work, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2020-03891Workplace Safety and Insurance Board KENN2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInitial stay time (IST), the duration of continuous work before core temperature reaches 38.0°C, has been characterized in young and older adults but not across consecutive work periods or in conjunction with standard work-rest cycles. We examined sex- and age-specific ISTs during moderate-intensity work in very warm conditions and evaluated the effectiveness of prescribed work-rest cycles.

methodsThirty young (18-30 years, n = 15 females) and thirty older (50-69 years, n = 15 females) habitually active, non-heat-acclimatized adults completed a 1.5-day simulated work protocol while wearing coveralls ( ~ 1-Clo). On Day 1, participants completed morning (AM1) and afternoon (PM1) work bouts separated by a 1 h lunch recovery in a cooled environment (22°C); on Day 2, a morning bout (AM2) was completed. Work consisted of treadmill walking at ~200 W·m

resultsIST was shorter in PM1 than AM1 but did not differ between mornings. Females reached 38.0°C faster than males, with older females showing the shortest IST. Work-rest cycles maintained mean rectal temperature ≤38.3°C in >90% of bouts, with no sex- or age-related differences in cumulative time above 38.0°C. Cardiovascular strain was higher during PM1, while perceptual measures did not reliably track physiological strain.

conclusionContinuous work to IST was reduced during afternoon work following morning work but was restored the next morning across sex and age groups. When applied after IST, prescribed work-rest cycles effectively maintained core temperature near safety limits. These findings highlight the need to consider work timing and worker characteristics when planning work in hot environments.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureRestWork Schedule ToleranceAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsBody TemperatureBody Temperature RegulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsTime FactorsWorking Conditionsageheat lossoccupational heat stresssexthermoregulationwork exposure limits

Identifiers

PMID41872066
PMCPMC13157603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.