ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2026
Assessment of Initial Stay Time and Work-Rest Scheduling Over Consecutive Moderate-Intensity Workdays in Hot Environments in Young and Older Males and Females.
Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Initial Stay Time and Work-Rest Scheduling Over Consecutive Moderate-Intensity Workdays in Hot Environments in Young and Older Males and Females.American journal of industrial medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInitial stay time (IST), the duration of continuous work before core temperature reaches 38.0°C, has been characterized in young and older adults but not across consecutive work periods or in conjunction with standard work-rest cycles. We examined sex- and age-specific ISTs during moderate-intensity work in very warm conditions and evaluated the effectiveness of prescribed work-rest cycles.
methodsThirty young (18-30 years, n = 15 females) and thirty older (50-69 years, n = 15 females) habitually active, non-heat-acclimatized adults completed a 1.5-day simulated work protocol while wearing coveralls ( ~ 1-Clo). On Day 1, participants completed morning (AM1) and afternoon (PM1) work bouts separated by a 1 h lunch recovery in a cooled environment (22°C); on Day 2, a morning bout (AM2) was completed. Work consisted of treadmill walking at ~200 W·m
resultsIST was shorter in PM1 than AM1 but did not differ between mornings. Females reached 38.0°C faster than males, with older females showing the shortest IST. Work-rest cycles maintained mean rectal temperature ≤38.3°C in >90% of bouts, with no sex- or age-related differences in cumulative time above 38.0°C. Cardiovascular strain was higher during PM1, while perceptual measures did not reliably track physiological strain.
conclusionContinuous work to IST was reduced during afternoon work following morning work but was restored the next morning across sex and age groups. When applied after IST, prescribed work-rest cycles effectively maintained core temperature near safety limits. These findings highlight the need to consider work timing and worker characteristics when planning work in hot environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.