ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Pretraining improves prediction of genomic datasets across species.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Generative artificial intelligence in animal genomics for smart agriculture: Applications, challenges, and future prospects.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRecent studies suggest that deep neural network models trained on thousands of human genomic datasets can accurately predict genomic features, including gene expression and chromatin accessibility. However, training these models is computation- and time-intensive, and datasets of comparable size do not exist for most other organisms.
resultsHere, we identify modifications to an existing state-of-the-art model that improve model accuracy while reducing training time and computational cost. Using this streamlined model architecture, we investigate the ability of models pretrained on human genomic datasets to transfer performance to a variety of different tasks. Models pretrained on human data but fine-tuned on genomic datasets from diverse tissues and species achieved significantly higher prediction accuracy while significantly reducing training time compared to models trained from scratch, with Pearson correlation coefficients between experimental results and predictions as high as 0.8. Further, we found that including excessive training tasks decreased model performance and that this decrease could be partially but not completely rescued by fine-tuning. Thus, simplifying model architecture, applying pretrained models, and carefully considering the number of training tasks may be effective and economical techniques for building new models across data types, tissues, and species. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code is available on GitHub and Figshare: https://github.com/optimizedlearning/genomicsML, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31796116.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.