Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872013›Full record

ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2026

JADE: jawbone lesion diagnosis and decision supporting system.

Soroush Baseri Saadi, Jonas Ver Berne, Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele, Peter Claes, Reinhilde Jacobs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Soroush Baseri SaadiOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2092-6076
Jonas Ver BerneOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8879-6052
Rocharles Cavalcante FonteneleOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6426-9768
Peter ClaesDepartment of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9489-9819
Reinhilde JacobsOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3461-0363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and evaluate JADE, a proof-of-concept retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) diagnostic assistive system, designed to enhance large language model (LLM) reasoning for jawbone lesion assessment. This study examined whether RAG improves diagnostic accuracy and stability compared with standalone LLMs and ORAD, a supervised learning-based system.

methodsJADE was developed as a cloud-based RAG system integrating an expert-curated oral radiology database embedded using text-embedding-3-large and indexed in Qdrant Cloud. Structured clinical inputs were encoded as prioritized vector queries. Hybrid semantic and keyword-based retrieval appended relevant evidence to prompts for differential diagnosis generation across LLM backbones. Performance was evaluated in 25 validation cases and compared with GPT-5, Claude Sonnet 4.5, DeepSeek-R1, Gemini 2.5 Flash, their RAG configurations, and ORAD. Diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using Cochran's Q test, with post-hoc McNemar's tests and Bonferroni correction. Intra-model stability and response time were assessed.

resultsRAG-GPT-5 achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (20/25), followed by RAG-Claude Sonnet 4.5 (18/25), RAG-DeepSeek R1 (17/25), and RAG-Gemini 2.5 Flash (15/25). Standalone models achieved 9-13/25 correct diagnoses, ORAD achieved 17/25. No significant differences were observed among standalone models or RAG-based models and ORAD. A significant improvement was observed for GPT-5 when integrated with RAG (P = .002). RAG configurations showed higher intra-model stability, with RAG-GPT-5 achieving mean stability of 0.90 ± 0.11. Mean response times ranged from 3 to 10 s.

conclusionsJADE improved diagnostic accuracy and stability compared with standalone LLMs, underscoring value of RAG reasoning in jawbone lesion assessment and marking the first RAG application in dentomaxillofacial radiology.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalJaw DiseasesDiagnosis, DifferentialGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language Modelscloud-based applicationsdifferential diagnosishybrid retrievaljawbone lesionslarge language modelsretrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID41872013
PMCPMC13317976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.