Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41871979›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2026

Clinical use of reserved guide wire fenestration and Viabahn-covered stent in Stanford type B aortic dissection with left subclavian artery involvement.

Haoxiang Zhu, Huipeng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haoxiang ZhuDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, China.
Huipeng ZhuDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, China.ORCID 0009-0004-9793-7314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of external fenestration using a reserved guide wire and a Viabahn-covered stent in Stanford type B aortic dissection that involves the left subclavian artery. Eight patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery were treated from March 2023 to May 2024 at Yinzhou People's Hospital using a reserved guide wire external fenestration and a Viabahn-covered stent. This study compared a novel external fenestration technique (reserved guide wire + Viabahn stent) with traditional in-situ fenestration for Stanford type B aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery. Clinical data showed that the new method achieved full technical success in vessel reconstruction, with no postoperative deaths, minimal complications, and shorter hospital stay versus the conventional approach. The fenestration complication incidence was also significantly reduced during a follow-up period of 1-3 months. Studies on larger samples can be performed in the future to verify the present results. External stent fenestration with a reserved guide wire demonstrated significant efficacy in treating large-branch artery disease, resulting in substantial improvements in prognosis in terms of complications. Therefore, this technique is worthy of further exploration.

Indexed as

Dissection, Thoracic AortaEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStentsSubclavian Arterycase seriesleft subclavian arteryReserved guide wireStanford B type aortic dissectionViabahn-covered stent

Identifiers

PMID41871979
PMCPMC13009931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.