ReviewTuberculosis and respiratory diseases2026
Innovative Tools and Perspectives in Cough Management: Cancer and Cough.
Review in Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cough is a prevalent symptom in lung cancer that impairs quality of life. Postoperative cough after pulmonary resection (CAP) has an incidence of approximately 21.1%-55.8%. CAP tends to peak around 1-month post-surgery, and often improves by 3 months. Risk factors for persistent CAP include female sex, extensive resection (e.g., lobectomy or lymph node dissection), and postoperative gastroesophageal reflux. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs significantly reduce postoperative cough incidence and improve cough-specific quality of life. In patients with lung cancer, cough occurs in over 50% of cases, regardless of stage or histology. A stepwise management algorithm is recommended: first treat the cancer and any contributing comorbidities, then use simple demulcents to soothe airways. If needed, add centrally acting antitussives such as codeine or dextromethorphan, followed by peripherally acting agents (e.g., levodropropizine, benzonatate, or levocloperastine). In refractory cases, the neurokinin- 1 (NK1) receptor antagonist aprepitant reduced cough frequency in a randomized trial. Substance P, which activates NK1 receptors in vagal sensory pathways, appears to drive cough; aprepitant blocks this activation in preclinical models. Cough is a common and burdensome symptom in lung cancer, whether post-surgical or disease-related. This narrative review outlines a stepwise approach to evaluation and treatment, starting with cancer-directed therapy and supportive care, followed by evidence-backed antitussives. Emerging therapies like NK1 receptor antagonists show promise for refractory cases. High-quality trials are needed to further validate these approaches and integrate them into standard care to improve the quality of life of patients with lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.