ReviewBMJ global health2026
From harm to healing: transforming the lives of victims of conflict-related sexual violence through reparation.
Review in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reparations and distributive justice in global health.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Building reparative futures demands a reckoning with the crisis form of global health.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV) generates devastating harms that affect the individual victim (female, male, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Queer and inclusive of other orientations (LGBTIQ+), disabled, young and elderly), families, communities and the whole fabric of society. CRSV is a public health concern as it can lead to health consequences including physical, psychosocial and stigma-related harms that are exacerbated by a lack of healthcare infrastructure. There has been some progress on understanding the harm, but data gaps prevail due to practical reasons, definitional problems and stigma.When violations of human rights or humanitarian law take place, diverse harms can occur, and victims have a right to reparation as enshrined in international law. Reparation aims to address, as far as possible, the multiple harms victims suffer and to positively transform their lives. The right to reparation is fulfilled through a victim-centred process and delivered via appropriate forms of reparation: restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction measures and guarantees of non-repetition. When implemented in a timely, participatory and inclusive manner, reparations can have a transformative impact on victims of CRSV. The process should be prompt and combined with individual monetary and rehabilitation measures alongside clear institutional and societal reforms to ensure the non-repetition of such violations. Domestic reparation programmes, fully supported by government and other stakeholders such as health professionals, offer the most sustainable framework for achieving these goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.