ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2026
Urinary α-Carboxyethyl Hydroxychromanol (α-CEHC)-A Biomarker of Vitamin E Intake: A Scoping Review.
Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary α-carboxyethyl hydroxychromanol (α-CEHC), the terminal catabolic product of α-tocopherol, has been proposed as a noninvasive biomarker of vitamin E intake. Existing human studies vary substantially in design, population characteristics, analytical methods, and reporting practices, limiting the comparability of findings across the literature. The objective of this scoping review is to systematically map all human evidence evaluating urinary α-CEHC in relation to vitamin E intake, catabolism, or health status. The protocol for this scoping review was registered in Open Science Framework on 26 October 2025 (https://osf.io/a7gkv). Following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting standards, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and CINAHL. The initial literature search yielded 586 records. Two reviewers independently screened all records, extracted data using piloted forms, and organized findings into thematic domains reflecting biomarker responsiveness, methodological variability, and clinical contexts. A total of 34 studies were included, representing a wide range of vitamin E interventions, urine collection approaches, and analytical methods. Study heterogeneity was substantial. The increases in urinary α-CEHC excretion in response to supplemental vitamin E dose reported in 10 intervention studies were highly correlated (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.