Observational studyArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2026
Unmet Needs in the Care of Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy in Brazil.
Observational study in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a rare, progressive neuromuscular disorder primarily affecting boys, and it follows a predictable course. Early intervention is essential for effective management, but disparities in the care of patients with rare diseases hinder access to optimal treatment.To identify unmet needs and challenges in the care of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy within the Brazilian public health system compared with the private system.A cross-sectional observational study using the Delphi method was conducted with ten neurologists specialized in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The specialists participated in rounds of surveys to reach consensus on key issues, including diagnosis, treatment, and care. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.According to the Delphi panel, the public health system had an average diagnostic delay of 25 months compared with 10 months in the private sector. Although genetic testing is critical, it is not funded by the public health system. Other barriers included delayed corticosteroid treatment, limited access to multidisciplinary care, and insufficient medical devices. Patients in the public health system lost ambulation earlier (11-12 years of age) than those in the private sector (13-14 years of age). Life expectancy was significantly shorter in the public system, averaging 19 to 20 years compared with 26 to 27 years of age in the private sector.There are significant disparities in the care of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy within Brazil's public health system, resulting in worse outcomes. Enhancing access to genetic testing and early multidisciplinary care is crucial to improve the quality of life and survival of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.