ArticleJournal of health psychology2026
Cognitive behaviour therapy-informed guidelines for type 2 diabetes self-management: A Delphi method study.
Article in Journal of health psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of cognitive-behavioural therapy-informed guidelines that healthcare professionals can implement to improve self-management of adults with type 2 diabetes. A qualitative design using the Delphi method was employed. This method facilitated two rounds of feedback from a panel of 12 healthcare professionals, enabling collaborative refinement of the guidelines. Four major themes emerged during the first round of feedback: (1) the CBT-informed guidelines are clear and concise, (2) a need for information regarding role clarification, (3) the need to consider the patient's readiness to change and (4) the consideration that the guidelines may be time-consuming. The second round reiterated the clear, practical nature of the guidelines. The guidelines propose a framework that supports a holistic approach to self-management. The guidelines' flexibility enables healthcare professionals to adapt them to the diverse needs of individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.