ReviewThe Lancet. Microbe2026
Diagnostics for priority bacterial pathogens: global gaps and research needs for curbing antimicrobial resistance in low-resource settings.
Review in The Lancet. Microbe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major and growing threat to global health, development, and security, with the greatest burden borne by low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Without urgent intervention, cumulative deaths between 2020 and 2050, attributable to AMR, are projected to be 39·1 million globally. Effective diagnostics are important to bacterial pathogen detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and such diagnostics support antibiotic stewardship by reducing adverse drug events (eg, toxicity or allergy) and restricting the emergence and spread of AMR. Yet, access to appropriate diagnostics in LMICs remains constrained. This Review summarises the current landscape of commercial and pipeline bacterial in-vitro diagnostics, drawing on the updated WHO 2024 Bacterial Priority Pathogen List, the 2025 WHO diagnostic landscape analysis, and the WHO Diagnostic Initiative, which has four pillars, one of which focuses on research and innovation to improve diagnostics for AMR. We discuss phenotypic and non-phenotypic testing approaches, assess platform suitability across health system tiers in LMICs, and outline WHO priorities for the next 3-5 years to guide innovation and improve equitable access. Although multiple commercial platforms exist for bacterial identification and susceptibility or resistance testing, most platforms are infrastructure-intensive and confined to regional or reference laboratories, leaving major diagnostic gaps at primary and secondary care levels. Promising advances include rapid immunoassays and emerging molecular platforms; however, no simple, affordable, decentralised solution provides reliable identification and susceptibility or resistance testing for key bacterial priority pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.