ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2026
Treatment strategies for relapsed medulloblastoma in the pediatric population: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRelapsed medulloblastoma (MB) remains a significant cause of pediatric cancer mortality, accounting for approximately 10% of all childhood cancer deaths. Despite advances in molecular characterization and treatment of primary MB, no standardized protocol currently exists for managing recurrence. This case highlights a novel approach to treating relapsed MB and aims to contribute to the evolving understanding of optimal strategies in this setting. OBSERVATIONS: The authors describe the case of a pediatric patient with relapsed MB, characterized as group 4 MB , managed with a personalized treatment approach involving repeat craniospinal irradiation, chemotherapy, and bone marrow transplant. In parallel, they review current literature and ongoing clinical trials to contextualize this strategy within the broader landscape of relapsed MB management. The case underscores the heterogeneity in treatment approaches and the lack of consensus regarding best practices. At the time of this report, the patient is approximately 6 months post-bone marrow transplant and continues to be monitored for signs of disease recurrence. LESSONS: This case illustrates the importance of an individualized, multidisciplinary approach to relapsed MB, accounting for prior therapies, tumor biology, and patient goals. Ongoing research and collaboration are essential to establishing more effective, evidence-based standards of care for this challenging diagnosis. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25612.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.