Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41871393›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2026

Hemorrhagic presentation of a DICER-1-mutant primary intracranial sarcoma with negative MR spectroscopy: illustrative case.

Elias Geist, Callum D Dewar, Richard Crawford, Natalia M Kuhn, Brian Curry, Michael J Cirivello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elias GeistDepartment of Neurosurgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda.
Callum D DewarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda.
Richard CrawfordUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda.ORCID 0009-0003-8399-5065
Natalia M KuhnDepartment of Pathology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
Brian CurryDepartment of Neurosurgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda.
Michael J CirivelloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) carries significant morbidity and mortality. The etiology of secondary spontaneous IPH, which results from an underlying mass lesion or vascular anomaly, may be obscured on radiographic investigation by the overlying hemorrhage, even when advanced imaging modalities are used. This may lead to a delay in both diagnosis and initiation of targeted therapy. OBSERVATIONS: A 55-year-old man presented multiple times over an approximately 5-month period with recurrent, symptomatic right frontal IPH. During his initial evaluations, multiple imaging modalities, including MR spectroscopy, failed to identify an underlying lesion. Only on his most recent presentation did MRI demonstrate evidence of a hemorrhagic mass, which was subsequently resected and found to be a primary intracranial sarcoma. LESSONS: This case demonstrates the need to interpret negative MR spectroscopy results with caution in cases of hemorrhagic neoplasms. Furthermore, it highlights the difficulty when determining optimal resection timing in cases of spontaneous IPH without a clear etiology. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25899.

Indexed as

case reporthemorrhagic sarcomaintracranial hemorrhageMR spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID41871393
PMCPMC13007655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.