ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2026
Sex-Specific Neuroplasticity in the Brain of a Facultatively Social Orchid Bee.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroplasticity enables the brain to reorganize in response to developmental change and experience, thereby supporting behavioral flexibility. In insects, both age and experience are known to influence neural structure, but how these factors differ between the sexes remains largely unexplored. Here, using micro-CT scanning, we quantify volumetric plasticity across eight brain regions in the orchid bee Euglossa dilemma, a facultatively social species with pronounced sexual dimorphism in behavior. We show that neuroplasticity follows sex- and region-specific trajectories that map onto the distinct reproductive behaviors exhibited by male and female bees. Consistent with other insect species, both sexes exhibited neuroplasticity in the mushroom bodies but only males showed an experience-dependent expansion, which we attribute to the navigational demands of reproductive behaviors. This was further supported by the expansion of olfactory and visual processing centers associated with the sensory demands of perfume collection and courtship display. Females, in contrast, undergo an exclusively age-dependent volumetric expansion of the mushroom bodies, an experience-dependent expansion of the antennal lobes, and a reduction of the visual neuropils. These patterns of plasticity correlate with female nesting behavior and may reveal potential energy trade-offs during reproduction. Our findings provide the first evidence of exclusively age-driven neuroplasticity in the mushroom bodies of social female bees and establish E. dilemma as a valuable comparative model for studying the evolution of brain plasticity and behavioral adaptation in social insects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.