ArticleSystematic biology2026
Genomic Signatures of Speciation in Butterflies.
Article in Systematic biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Butterfly taxa discovery via genomic analysis.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2026Article
- Genomic analysis reveals new subspecies ofThe taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2026Article
- Three butterfly genera across the Central Texas Suture Zone.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The classification of organisms into species is fundamental to the study of life. Contrary to popular belief, simple and quantitative standards for species delineation are often lacking, and debates about species boundaries create obstacles for conservation biology, agriculture, legislation, and education. We chose butterflies as a model system to address this key biological question. We sequenced and analyzed transcriptomes of 186 butterfly specimens representing 25 pairs of species, representing close but clearly distinct species, conspecific populations, and taxa with debated relationships. We found that species are robustly separated from conspecific populations by the combination of two measures computed on Z-linked genes: a fixation index, which detects genetic gaps between species, and the extent of gene flow, which quantifies reproductive isolation. Applying these criteria suggest that all nine butterfly pairs with debated relationships are distinct species, not populations or subspecies. Furthermore, we found that elevated divergence and positive selection in proteins involved in DNA interaction, circadian clock, pheromone sensing, development, and immune response recurrently correlate with speciation. A significant fraction of these divergent proteins are encoded by the Z chromosome, which appears to be more resistant to introgression than autosomes. Taken together, our findings point to potential common speciation mechanisms in butterflies, provide additional support for the important role of the Z chromosome in speciation, and suggest quantitative criteria for species delimitation, which is vital for the exploration of biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.