Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41871274›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

The audience shapes the information content of the honey bee waggle dance.

Tao Lin, Shihao Dong, Gaoying Gu, Fu Zhang, Xiuchuan Ye, Tianyi Wang, Ziqi Wang, Jianjun Li, James C Nieh, Lars Chittka and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The audience shapes the information content of the honey bee waggle dance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tao LinLaboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5834-0989
Shihao DongLaboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9247-6553
Gaoying GuLaboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2601-1141
Fu ZhangLaboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6843-445X
Xiuchuan YeLaboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China.ORCID 0009-0006-6819-4253
Tianyi WangLaboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China.ORCID 0009-0007-9611-940X
Ziqi WangLaboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2343-3701
Jianjun LiLaboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8264-391X
James C NiehSchool of Biological Sciences, Department of Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093.ORCID 0000-0001-6237-0726
Lars ChittkaBiological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8153-1732
Ken TanLaboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0928-1561

Funding

National natural science fundation of China 32322051Nationnal natural science fundation of China 32571753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The honey bee waggle dance, which encodes food location, is often thought to involve only one-way information transfer from dancers to signal receivers. Here, we show that the information content of the dance is influenced by the presence of followers and the number of appropriately aged potential followers in the hive, rather than the total number of bees on the dance floor. Dancers reduced the precision of directional and distance communication when they had fewer actual and potential followers. Even when the dance floor was crowded with young bees that do not follow dances, dancers showed the same declines in precision. These declines appear to arise as a byproduct of audience seeking during the return run, when dancers with fewer followers spent more time moving and covered greater distances across the dance floor. Although their mean waggle run duration and the distance covered per waggle run remained unchanged, both measures became markedly more variable when followers were scarce. Dancers likely use quorum sensing of tactile contacts and, potentially, age-specific odors to sense audience size. These results reveal that waggle dancing is a socially responsive process shaped by feedback from followers, demonstrating bidirectional information flow within this communication system.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAnimalsBeesSocial Behavioranimal cognitionreferential communicationsignal encodingsocial communicationspectator influence

Identifiers

PMID41871274
PMCPMC13056074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.