ArticleJournal of diabetes research2026
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Crisugabalin for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A 52-Week, Multicenter, Single-Arm Trial.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05890053 (A 52-week, Open Phase III Study Evaluating the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of HSK16149 Capsules in Chinese Patients With Peripheral Neuralgia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 52-week, Open Phase III Study Evaluating the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of HSK16149 Capsules in Chinese Patients With Peripheral Neuralgia
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Crisugabalin for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A 52-Week, Multicenter, Single-Arm Trial.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe HSK16149-201/301 trial demonstrated short-term efficacy of the GABA analog crisugabalin for diabetic neuropathic pain.
methodsIn the current study, patients in both the crisugabalin and placebo control groups of the HSK16149-201/301 trial were invited to receive 80 mg/day crisugabalin for an additional 52 weeks. The primary end point was safety. The secondary end point was pain control as measured using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). A total of 301 patients (mean age 59.7 years and males 58.1%) were enrolled.
resultsThe rate of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 38.9% (117/301). The most frequent TRAEs were dizziness (27.2%), somnolence (8.3%), and peripheral edema (3.0%). The rate of Grade 3 or higher TRAEs was 1.7%. TRAEs led to dose reduction in 41 patients (13.6%), treatment interruption and discontinuation each in three patients (1.0%). At week 52, the mean difference in SF-MPQ pain rating index (PRI) and visual analog scale pain score from baseline was -2.5 (95% CI -2.9 to -2.0; paired t-test p < 0.0001) and -23.4 (95% CI -25.6 to -21.2; paired t-test p < 0.0001), respectively. The proportion of patients with SF-MPQ PPI score ≤ 1 increased by 19.0% over baseline (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsIn summary, crisugabalin at 80 mg/day was well tolerated and demonstrated sustained analgesic activities.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05890053.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.