SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Descriptions of the natural history of erythema nodosum leprosum to inform clinical classification - A semi-systematic review.
Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundErythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) is a severe immunological complication of leprosy, characterised by painful nodules, fever, arthralgia, oedema, and systemic symptoms. Temporal classifications-acute, recurrent, and chronic-are inconsistently applied, complicating data comparisons. Standardised and agreed definitions are essential to ensure consistency in diagnosis, research, and clinical management.
objectiveTo examine how temporal classifications of ENL are used in modern literature and compare them to descriptions from the pre-corticosteroid era.
methodsWe conducted a semi-systematic review of historical and contemporary literature. Historical texts published before 1940, prior to the introduction of sulfone antibiotics and corticosteroids, were purposively selected to capture descriptions of the natural history of ENL. For modern studies, we systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus, African Index Medicus, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov from May 2024 to March 2025. The systematic review identified 572 articles after de-duplication, and 41 met inclusion criteria for providing definitions of ENL subtypes.
resultsFive historical treatises were selected. Their clinical observations of nodular skin lesions with systemic symptoms-ranging in duration from weeks to months or even years-align with contemporary understandings of ENL. 41 studies included, at least one of the three temporal classifications (acute, recurrent, or chronic). The six-month criterion distinguishing acute and chronic ENL is used in all current definitions. However, definitions for recurrent and chronic ENL frequently overlapped, both referring to prolonged or multiple episodes after initial treatment, underscoring a lack of conceptual clarity.
conclusionThe absence of standardised ENL terminology impedes data comparison, meta-analysis, and clinical guideline development. A Delphi consensus process and longitudinal observational studies are recommended to refine, standardise agreed ENL classifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.