ArticlePloS one2026
A smoothing and bootstrap-based framework for early outbreak detection.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely detection of infectious disease outbreaks is critical for effective public health response. The effective reproduction number (Rt) is a key metric that captures transmission dynamics and signals the potential onset of outbreaks when it rises above 1. However, day-of-the-week and public holiday effects, along with random fluctuations in reported cases, can distort Rt estimates and reduce their usefulness for real-time surveillance. In this study, we present an Rt-based outbreak detection framework that integrates calendar-aware smoothing with bootstrap inference to quantify the uncertainty of smoothed Rt estimates. Using daily COVID-19 case data from Singapore, we evaluate several smoothing approaches-including a working-day moving average (MAH) that adjusts for public holidays-and compare the performance of the proposed method with established outbreak detection algorithms such as Early Aberration Reporting System (EARS), Bayesian-based detection methods (EpiEstim) and logistic regression-based approaches. In our framework, calendar-aware smoothing is not a generic pre-processing choice but a necessary, model-agnostic step that produces Rt inputs with reduced calendar artefacts. This makes subsequent inference and testing on Rt both more stable and more interpretable. Our results show that smoothing, particularly with MAH, improves the stability of Rt estimates and enables more reliable outbreak detection. The proposed method consistently demonstrates superior timeliness across observed and simulated outbreaks, while maintaining desired false positive rates. Simulation studies further confirm its robustness under varying sample sizes and case volumes, highlighting advantages over other methods. In conclusion, the proposed method offers a simple, interpretable, and theoretically grounded framework for early outbreak detection. Its consistent performance across real and simulated data suggests it may be broadly applicable to other infectious diseases with similar transmission dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.