Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41871132›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Sensitivity analysis enlightens effects of connectivity in a Neural Mass Model under Control-Target mode.

Anaïs Vallet, Stéphane Blanco, Coline Chevallier, Francis Eustache, Jacques Gautrais, Jean-Yves Grandpeix, Jean-Louis Joly, Shailendra Segobin, Pierre Gagnepain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anaïs ValletNormandie Univ, UNICAEN, PSL Research University, EPHE, INSERM, U1077, CHU de Caen, GIP Cyceron, Neuropsychologie et Imagerie de la Mémoire Humaine, Université de Normandie, Caen, France.
Stéphane BlancoCNRS, INPT, UPS, LAPLACE, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Coline ChevallierCNRS, INPT, UPS, LAPLACE, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Francis EustacheNormandie Univ, UNICAEN, PSL Research University, EPHE, INSERM, U1077, CHU de Caen, GIP Cyceron, Neuropsychologie et Imagerie de la Mémoire Humaine, Université de Normandie, Caen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4460-8686
Jacques GautraisCNRS, INPT, UPS, LAPLACE, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7002-9920
Jean-Yves GrandpeixLMD/IPSL, CNRS, École Polytechnique, ENS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Jean-Louis JolyCNRS, INPT, UPS, LAPLACE, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Shailendra SegobinNormandie Univ, UNICAEN, PSL Research University, EPHE, INSERM, U1077, CHU de Caen, GIP Cyceron, Neuropsychologie et Imagerie de la Mémoire Humaine, Université de Normandie, Caen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-8210
Pierre GagnepainNormandie Univ, UNICAEN, PSL Research University, EPHE, INSERM, U1077, CHU de Caen, GIP Cyceron, Neuropsychologie et Imagerie de la Mémoire Humaine, Université de Normandie, Caen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4949-9829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biophysical models of human brain represent the latter as a graph of inter-connected neural regions. Building from the model by Naskar et al. (Network Neuroscience, 2021), our motivation was to understand how these brain regions can be connected at neural level to implement some inhibitory control, which calls for inhibitory connectivity rarely considered in such models. In this model, regions are made of inter-connected excitatory and inhibitory pools of neurons, but are long-range connected only via excitatory pools (mutual excitation). We thus extend this model by generalizing connectivity, and we analyse how connectivity affects the behaviour of this model. Focusing on the simplest paradigm made of a Control area and a Target area, we explore four typical kinds of connectivity: mutual excitation, Target inhibition by Control, Control inhibition by Target, and mutual inhibition. For this, we build an analytical sensitivity framework, nesting up sensitivities of isolated pools, of isolated regions, and of the full system. We show that inhibitory control can emerge only in Target inhibition by Control and mutual inhibition connectivities. We next offer an analysis of how the model sensitivities depends on connectivity structure, depending on a parameter controling the strength of the self-inhibition within Target region. Finally, we illustrate the effect of connectivity structure upon control effectivity in response to an external forcing in the Control area. Beyond the case explored here, our methodology to build analytical sensitivities by nesting up levels (pool, region, system) lays the groundwork for expressing nested sensitivities for more complex network configurations, either for this model or any other one.

Indexed as

BrainModels, NeurologicalNerve NetComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansNeural InhibitionNeurons

Identifiers

PMID41871132
PMCPMC13008111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.