Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41871126›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Numerical simulation of a hot-air cleaning fan for the combine harvester.

Tao Zhang, Guoliang You, Yaoming Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tao ZhangSchool of Intelligent Equipment and Technology, Wuxi Taihu University, Wuxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1347-5927
Guoliang YouSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Yaoming LiSchool of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to improve the separation efficiency of damp crops by developing a hot-air cleaning fan. First, the aerodynamic performance of two fans with different inlet structures was compared. The results showed a direct correlation between the static pressure and the outlet air velocity. The modified-inlet fan has an outlet average air velocity very close to the original fan of the combine harvester. Hence, the modified- inlet fan model was chosen for further analysis. Subsequent evaluations were conducted to assess the effects of fan speed, inlet air temperature, and volute temperature on fan performance. Fan speed exhibited a negative correlation with outlet air temperature but a positive correlation with outlet air velocity, at both the upper and lower outlets. Furthermore, both the inlet air temperature and the volute temperature were directly related to the air temperature at these outlets. A Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with three factors at three levels was utilized to optimize fan parameters, identifying fan speed and inlet air temperature as the predominant factors affecting outlet air velocity and temperature, respectively.The optimal set of parameters was determined to be a fan speed of 1445 rpm, an inlet temperature of 85 °C, and a volute temperature of 60 °C. Under these conditions, bench test results indicated the average air velocity and temperature are basically consistent with the theoretical optimal value.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrops, AgriculturalHot TemperatureAir MovementsComputer SimulationModels, TheoreticalTemperature

Identifiers

PMID41871126
PMCPMC13008064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.