ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Brucella abortus and public health risk: Prevalence in milk sold at open markets in Cameroon.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among livestock owners, traders, and slaughterhouse inspectors in Cameroon reveals marginal understanding of livestock and human brucellosis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brucellosis, a neglected zoonotic disease, is endemic in many sub-Saharan African countries, including Cameroon. Recent studies have shown that Brucella abortus infects multiple livestock species throughout Cameroon. While the presence and risk to humans have been identified at farms and abattoirs, the bacterium has never been detected in milk intended for human consumption. In Cameroon, milk is commonly sold at open-air markets for human consumption without regulation. This study investigates the presence of Brucella spp. in milk sold at these markets in three regions: the Far North, North, and West. Cow milk samples and surveys were collected from 380 merchants in each region, totaling 1,140 samples and surveys. Each sample underwent iELISA, culture, real-time PCR, and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Surveys assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of milk merchants. Results indicate that B. abortus is not only endemic in livestock but present in milk sold for human consumption. Culture results show a countrywide positivity of 1.3% (1.1% Far North, 1.1% North, 1.8% West). Real-time PCR results indicate a 4.0% positivity rate (2.4% Far North, 5.5% North, 4.0% West). iELISA indicates 21% of the milk samples contained anti-Brucella antibodies, with significant regional variations (38.4% Far North, 15.5% North, 8.9% West). Finally, NGS revealed that the bacterial isolates from milk are epidemiologically linked to those obtained from animals across the region. KAP analysis shows that only 26.4% of merchants boil and 91.2% mix the milk from multiple cattle before sale. All surveyed merchants selling culture-positive milk engaged in risky behaviors, resulting in the sale of contaminated milk to approximately 720 people each week. This study highlights the risk of human brucellosis extending beyond farms and abattoirs to the general public. Future research should investigate milk consumers' habits and prevalence to better understand brucellosis risk in Cameroon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.