ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Development and pilot application of a point-of-need molecular xenomonitoring protocol for tsetse (Glossina sp.) in a low-resource setting.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTsetse flies (Glossina sp.) are the primary vectors of trypanosomes causing human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) and animal African trypanosomiasis (AAT). Disease surveillance can be carried out by detecting Trypanosoma DNA in tsetse, also known as molecular xenomonitoring. Whilst molecular methods can increase the efficiency and sensitivity of pathogen detection, trained staff and a well-equipped laboratory are required. In many cases, DNA extraction and screening is outsourced to a central laboratory in a major city either in-country or abroad, far removed from original tsetse collection sites. This increases results turnaround time, incurs transportation costs, and can lead to sample loss or damage. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE
findingsWe set out to develop, optimise and trial methods for tsetse xenomonitoring in a low-resource point-of-need setting. A low-cost protocol was developed consisting of rapid alkali-based DNA extraction and Trypanosoma detection qPCR assays using air-dryable reagent mixes. A minimally-equipped laboratory was established in a field station in Arua, Uganda. Following a training workshop, three entomology technicians carried out screening on 286 tsetse collected over a nine-week study period. The technicians consistently extracted high quality DNA (98% success rate) and were able to successfully detect T. brucei sensu lato in 4.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) [2.23 - 7.37]), T. congolense in 3.6% (95% CI [1.73 - 6.47]) and T. vivax in 3.9% (95% CI [1.98 - 6.92]) of total tsetse, representing a total Trypanosoma sp detection prevalence of 10.7% (95% CI [9.6 - 11.8]). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrated that sensitive molecular xenomonitoring of HAT and AAT pathogens can be carried out without the need for cold-chain storage or high-powered equipment. Further improvements to the system might be achieved by modifying the DNA extraction protocol to enable high-throughput or pooled samples, increasing the sensitivity of the T. b. gambiense DNA detection assay and exploring more sustainable power sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.