ArticlePloS one2026
Coenrollment of critically ill patients in PROSPECT: A protocol and statistical analysis plan.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe enrollment of a patient into more than one study (i.e., coenrollment) has risks which warrant exploration, particularly with respect to possible effects on trial outcomes. This pre-planned secondary analysis will examine the sensitivity of treatment effects to coenrollment in an international critical care trial (Probiotics: Prevention of Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial (PROSPECT). OBJECTIVE(S): The primary objective is to evaluate the sensitivity of the effect of probiotics on the primary endpoint of VAP to patient coenrollment in at least one other study. The secondary objectives are to describe the characteristics of coenrolled patients and the studies they were coenrolled into; examine any differences in baseline traits; understand differences in center-level characteristics between coenrolling and non-coenrolling centers; identify factors associated with coenrollment; and explore the relationship between coenrollment status and the incidence of adverse events.
methodsWe developed a protocol and statistical analysis plan (SAP) for this secondary analysis involving the conduct of a Cox regression model, including treatment allocation, coenrollment status, and the interaction between the two as independent variables. We also describe our planned statistical analyses for the secondary objectives, involving descriptive statistics, univariable analyses, and multivariable analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal focused on critical care research or trial methodology, and presented at local, national, and international conferences. As a secondary analysis, this study will not undergo secondary research ethics board approval. Data will be presented in aggregate and without patient identifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.