ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2026
Criteria for selecting the Paganin-filter reconstruction parameter in X-ray phase-contrast tomography.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- On optimisation of Paganin's method for propagation-based X-ray phase-contrast imaging and tomography.Journal of microscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Paganin filter, widely employed in propagation-based phase-contrast X-ray computed tomography with synchrotron light, attenuates phase effects and suppresses high-frequency noise under the assumption that samples have a constant β/δ ratio (these constants define the material's complex refractive index n = 1 - δ + iβ). While effective in many scenarios, real samples often violate this strong assumption, and the choice of the filter's free reconstruction parameter is typically made empirically, potentially leading to suboptimal image quality. This work introduces a quantitative, noise-aware criterion for determining a near-optimal filter parameter, thereby removing the need for subjective tuning. We propose two methods for this task. The first method is based on analysis of the noise power spectrum in radial frequency bands, adopting the same partitioning framework as Fourier ring correlation (FRC). By monitoring high-frequency behavior, the proposed approach identifies the trade-off point where resolution enhancement is balanced against noise amplification. This criterion enforces a theoretical lower bound on the FRC computed between two independently split Paganin-filtered projections, where each projection corresponds to a single recorded detector frame, while ensuring effective suppression of high-frequency noise. The second method analyzes the variation of the reconstructed images as a function of the Paganin-filter parameter, identifying the inflection point that represents the balance between noise suppression and image smoothing. Both methods result in an automated parameter selection approach for phase-contrast tomography data analysis that employs the Paganin filter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.