ArticleJournal of midwifery & women's health
Midwifery Students' Experiences Obtaining Clinical Placements and Associations With Training Quality: "I Had to Figure It Out on My Own".
Article in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early Career Midwives' Recommendations to Improve Clinical Education: "Honestly, We Just Need to Do Better".Journal of midwifery & women's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHands-on clinical education is essential to midwifery training, yet the US system relies heavily on informal networks of clinical preceptors. Challenges in securing placements may affect students' preparedness and satisfaction with training, but empirical data are limited. This study examines how responsibility for and difficulty in securing clinical placements are associated with the early-career midwives' reports of the quality of their midwifery clinical education.
methodsWe conducted a national cross-sectional survey in 2024 of certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) and certified midwives (CMs) who received American Midwifery Certification Board certification between 2019 and 2024. The primary independent variable measured the process of finding a clinical placement, combining the responsibility for finding a placement (school vs student) with the difficulty of securing it. Logistic and linear regressions assessed associations with multiple measures of training quality, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, degree type, year of certification, and number of placements. Open-ended responses were analyzed thematically.
resultsFewer than half of respondents (46.0%) reported that their school had primary responsibility for their placements, 37.8% arranged their own placements with difficulty, and 16.2% arranged their own placements without difficulty. Compared with other students, those who were able to find their own clinical placements without difficulty had higher-quality clinical education across all measured outcomes, including greater satisfaction, a greater sense of competence as a midwife, better clinical learning environments, and more positive perceptions of preceptor support and midwifery-aligned philosophy. Qualitative findings described high stress, lack of school support, and reliance on personal networks to secure placements. DISCUSSION: The burden of finding clinical placements negatively affects student clinical training experiences. Variability and inequity in the current clinical placement system threaten the quality of midwifery education and, ultimately, the strength of the midwifery workforce. A structured, equitable, and formalized clinical placement system is needed to ensure consistent, high-quality midwifery education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.