ReviewCardiology journal2026
Artificial intelligence as the missing integrator in heart failure care - from remote monitoring to personalized therapy.
Review in Cardiology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Four Pillars: A Risk-Targeted Framework for Vericiguat-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- From monitoring to meaning: why artificial intelligence will redefine heart failure care.Cardiology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) remains a leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization worldwide, despite the availability of effective evidence-based therapies. The principal challenge is no longer the absence of treatment options but the limited capacity of traditional care models to deliver guidelinedirected medical therapy (GDMT) consistently and at scale. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of hospital-centered HF care, highlighting the need for more resilient, patient-centered management strategies. Remote monitoring (RM) has been proposed as a solution, yet its clinical impact has been inconsistent due to fragmented data streams, declining patient adherence, and heavy reliance on continuous human oversight. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers an opportunity to address these limitations by integrating multidimensional clinical data, enabling earlier detection of deterioration, supporting adherence, and prioritizing clinically meaningful interventions. Emerging evidence suggests that AI-assisted workflows can accelerate GDMT optimization and improve surrogate and clinical outcomes when implemented within supervised care pathways. This has led to the concept of next-generation remote monitoring (NGRM), in which AI analyzes longitudinal physiological and behavioral signals to generate context-aware alerts and actionable recommendations while reducing clinical workload. Successful implementation, however, requires rigorous validation, clear governance, integration with clinical workflows, and safeguards for safety, equity, and accountability. When embedded within structured HF care pathways, AI-enabled monitoring may help bridge the persistent gap between evidence and real-world implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.