Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41871023›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Reliability and validity of the Sinhala version of the physical activity questionnaire for older children (PAQ-C).

E Liyanage, C Jayasinghe, I Liyanage

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E LiyanageDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
C JayasingheDepartment of Physical Therapy, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
I LiyanageDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8352-9182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn Sri Lanka, as non-communicable diseases rise, the significance of physical activity is increasingly recognised, particularly in children. The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) is widely used and can be considered as one of the best available tools for assessing physical activity in children. However, a validated tool for Sinhala-speaking children in Sri Lanka has been lacking. This study aims to culturally adapt and validate the PAQ-C for Sinhala-speaking children and evaluate its psychometric properties. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study involved 301 schoolchildren (197 males and 104 females) aged 8-11 years, during which the PAQ-C was translated into Sinhala, and a pre-final version was developed. In terms of validity, content validity, that is, the degree to which the content of an instrument is an adequate reflection of the construct to be measured, was assessed using the content validity index. In terms of reliability, test-retest reliability was measured with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

resultsThe Sinhala version of the PAQ-C demonstrated CVI at both item and scale levels is as one. The ICC was acceptable at 0.83.

conclusionThe Sinhala version of the PAQ-C demonstrates good content validity and acceptable test-retest reliability, affirming its suitability as a cost-effective tool for assessing physical activity levels among Sinhala-speaking children in Sri Lanka and supporting informed interventions and public health strategies in the country.

Indexed as

ExerciseMotor ActivityChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSri LankaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41871023
PMCPMC13008094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.