Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870968›Full record

Observational studyJornal brasileiro de nefrologia

Kinetics of cellular immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine boosters in dialysis and kidney transplant patients without infection.

Roberto Matias Souza, Julia Soares Reis, Helio Tedesco-Silva, Lúcio Requião-Moura, José Medina-Pestana, Renato Demarchi Foresto

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roberto Matias SouzaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Medicina, Disciplina de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7019-6174
Julia Soares ReisUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Medicina, Disciplina de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9804-6446
Helio Tedesco-SilvaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Medicina, Disciplina de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9896-323X
Lúcio Requião-MouraUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Medicina, Disciplina de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8751-9048
José Medina-PestanaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Medicina, Disciplina de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0750-7360
Renato Demarchi ForestoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Medicina, Disciplina de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9370-0265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) present impaired immune response to COVID-19 vaccines. Although vaccination remains the primary strategy to reduce mortality, data on the cellular immune response kinetics in these populations are limited. This study evaluated the kinetics of vaccine-induced cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in dialysis and KTRs without prior infection.

methodsThis is a post-hoc analysis of a prospective, observational, single-center study comparing the cellular immunity kinetics induced by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in adult patients undergoing kidney transplant (n = 77) and patients on dialysis (n = 92). Those who had COVID-19 were excluded. Blood samples were collected at screening and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to assess SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses using a commercial Interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA, QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 RUO), with results classified as positive, negative, or indeterminate. Comparisons were performed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests.

resultsPositive IGRA results were infrequent in transplant and dialysis patients over time (Screening: 8.1% vs. 23.2%; M1: 14.1% vs. 16.5%; M3: 10% vs. 7.1%; M6: 1.5% vs. 2.5%; M12: 15.2% vs. 13.4%), but indeterminate results were common (Screening: 82.4% vs. 17.8%; M1: 71.8% vs. 42.4%; M3: 62.9% vs. 47.1%; M6: 69.1% vs. 58.8%; M12: 30.3% vs. 19.4%), particularly among KTRs, although they received more vaccine boosters (95 vs. 63; p < 0.001). No correlation was observed between the number of vaccine doses and IGRA positivity.

conclusionDespite multiple vaccine boosters, dialysis and kidney transplant patients exhibited limited and variable cellular immune responses, highlighting the need for improved vaccination and monitoring strategies in these high-risk populations.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunity, CellularKidney TransplantationRenal DialysisAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID41870968
PMCPMC13008128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.