ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2026
Between Memory and Oblivion : Considerations on The Ethical Challenges of Anthropological Research on Identifiable Individuals.
Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The bioarchaeological study of identified human remains represents a powerful tool for reconstructing past lives and enriching historical knowledge. Through osteobiography, it is possible to integrate bioanthropological, archaeological, molecular, and archival data to provide a deeper understanding of individual life histories. However, this approach raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding post-mortem privacy, the right to be forgotten, and the limits of public disclosure. While scientific research contributes to preserving individual and collective memory, it must also consider the perspectives of descendant communities and the potential social and cultural implications of disseminating such detailed personal information. This paper explores these ethical dilemmas, reporting different case studies and discussing the challenges of balancing scientific inquiry, historical memory preservation, and respect for the deceased's dignity. The article aims to encourage further critical reflection on the management of post-mortem memory in anthropological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41870867What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.