SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Desmoplastic Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe propensity of desmoplastic melanoma (DM) to spread to regional lymph nodes remains disputed, creating uncertainty regarding the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This is further complicated by challenges in distinguishing pure from mixed histologic subtypes. We evaluated pooled SLN positivity rates for both subtypes to clarify the utility of SLNB in the workup of patients with DM.
methodsTwo databases (PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE) were searched through July 2025. We included studies in which at least a subset of patients with DM underwent SLNB and SLNB positivity rates could be ascertained; large registry-based studies were excluded. Our primary outcome was the pooled sentinel lymph node positivity rate for patients with DM. We performed a subgroup analysis to determine pooled SLN positivity by histologic subtype.
resultsWe included 18 studies with 1671 patients with DM. A random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled SLN positivity rate of 9% (95% CI, 7-12%). No significant association was found between positivity and Breslow depth (β = 0.058, p = 0.749) or ulceration (β = 0.763, p = 0.677). Ten studies reported subtype-specific rates. The pooled positivity rate was 6% (95% CI, 4-8%) for pure DM and 15% (95% CI, 10-20%) for mixed DM.
conclusionsPatients with mixed DM may derive greater prognostic and diagnostic benefit from SLNB, whereas SLNB in pure DM may be considered selectively, particularly in the setting of histopathologic uncertainty or other high-risk features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.