ArticleAnatomical science international2026
Prevalence of persistent left superior vena cava in the general population: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Article in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Coronary Venous System in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Right-Sided Dual-Chamber Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava: A Case Report on Personalized Conduction System Pacing.Case reports in cardiology · 2026Article
- Vaginal Agenesis (Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome) Presenting with Exertional Dyspnoea, Fatigue and Intermittent Palpitations.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent left superior vena cava is a congenital variation of the thoracic venous system. Although it is often asymptomatic, its presence can complicate procedures such as central venous access, cardiac device implantation, and cardiothoracic surgery. Reported prevalence data are inconsistent and predominantly derived from populations with underlying cardiac pathology. This study seeks to provide a robust, evidence-based estimate of the prevalence of persistent left superior vena cava in populations not preselected for congenital heart disease. Additionally, it aims to quantify its principal anatomical configurations, including the laterality of the superior vena cava and the presence or absence of a bridging brachiocephalic vein. A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies documenting the prevalence of persistent left superior vena cava in populations not selected on the basis of congenital heart disease criteria were included. Statistical analysis was carried out using random-effects meta-analytic models. Eighteen studies (n = 169,835 individuals) were included. The pooled prevalence of persistent left superior vena cava was 0.61% (95% CI: 0.38-0.89), with substantial heterogeneity across studies. Subgroup analysis demonstrated higher detection rates in cadaveric investigations (2.08%) compared with interventional studies (0.38%), likely reflecting differences in detection sensitivity. Bilateral superior vena cava was observed in 0.32% of the population, whereas isolated persistent left superior vena cava occurred in 0.10%. A bridging brachiocephalic vein was present in approximately 0.11% of the total population. Although uncommon, persistent left superior vena cava is a reproducible component of thoracic venous morphology with embryological significance. Awareness of its anatomical configurations is important in diagnostic and procedural contexts, especially when a dilated coronary sinus is observed during imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41870825What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.