Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870811›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2026

Patients' and family members' experiences with cascade testing for Lynch syndrome in the USA: a qualitative interview study.

Natalie P Stewart, Eliza K Courtney, Megan C Roberts, Erin Turbitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natalie P StewartGraduate School of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1573-988X
Eliza K CourtneyChildren's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1017-0372
Megan C Roberts *University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3434-2773
Erin Turbitt *Graduate School of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia. erin.turbitt@uts.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6650-9702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cascade testing for Lynch syndrome is critical for the identification of at-risk relatives who may benefit from early detection and risk-reduction strategies. Uptake of cascade testing within families has consistently remained low, and strategies developed to address this have had varying degrees of success. Limited research exists that investigates the perspectives and lived experiences of individuals with or at risk of Lynch syndrome, particularly through rich qualitative methods in the context of cascade testing. This study aimed to explore the lived experience of patients and relatives with cascade testing for Lynch syndrome in the USA. We analyzed qualitative interviews performed with twenty patients either diagnosed with Lynch syndrome, or with a family member diagnosed with Lynch syndrome, using reflexive thematic analysis. Three overarching themes were developed: (1) logistics of disclosure, 2) emotions and beliefs surrounding cascade testing, and 3) reflections on strengths and limitations cascade testing. Genetic counseling was an important component of the cascade testing process; however, participants often described feeling under supported. We propose that alternative models of service provision could help to address this lack of support, and therefore assist in optimizing uptake of cascade testing for Lynch syndrome.

Indexed as

Cascade testingFamily experienceGenetic counselingHereditary cancerLynch syndromePatient experience

Identifiers

PMID41870811
PMCPMC13009310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.