Trial reportChinese journal of integrative medicine2026
Efficacy and Safety of Shenfu Injection in Patients with Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Open-Label Trial with Network Pharmacology-Based Mechanistic Insights.
Trial report in Chinese journal of integrative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of Shenfu Injection (SFI) in treating patients with septic shock through a randomized controlled trial, and explore the underling mechanisms by network pharmacology.
methodsA prospective, single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled clinical trial was conducted between November 3, 2022 and May 4, 2025 to assess the effectiveness safety of SFI in 122 patients with septic shock (arterial blood lactate 4.5-7.0 mmol/L). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the experimental or control group using stratified block randomization. In addition to the standard care recommended by guidelines, the treatment group received SFI (100 mL) combined with 0.9% saline (100 mL), while the control group received 0.9% saline (200 mL), both via intravenous infusion over 60 min once daily for 7 consecutive days and followed by a 28-d follow-up period. Primary outcomes included 28-d all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes comprised duration of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays, duration of mechanical ventilation, arterial blood lactate levels, norepinephrine dose, mean arterial pressure (MAP), lactate clearance, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), and troponin I (TnI) levels on day 7. Aderverse events were recorded and compared between groups. Furthermore, Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses were performed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
resultsThe 28-d all-cause mortality was 41.0% (25/61) in the SFI group compared with 50.8% (31/61) in the control group (P=0.271). The 7-d all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the SFI group (4.9%, 3/61) compared with the control group (16.4%, 10/61; P=0.046). On day 7 post-enrollment, the norepinephrine dose in the SFI group was significantly lower than that in the control group [1.48 (1.12, 1.82) vs. 2.37 (1.68, 2.80) µ,g·kg
conclusionIn patients with septic shock and lactate levels of 4.5-7.0 mmol/L, adjunctive SFI did not significantly reduce 28-d all-cause mortality. However, it was associated with a significant reduction in 7-d mortality and improved hemodynamic, metabolic, and cardiac parameters by day 7, with a favorable safety profile. Network pharmacology analysis suggests its potential mechanisms may involve modulation of inflammatory and cellular signaling pathways. (Trial registration No. ChiCTR2200065122).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41870792What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.