Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870765›Full record

Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026

Relationship between culprit lesion high-risk plaque features and adverse cardiovascular outcome at two years follow-up in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Insights from the OPTICO-ACS study.

Gregor Nelles, Youssef S Abdelwahed, Claudio Seppelt, Denitsa Meteva, Mukaram Rana, Lena M Seegers, Lara Sieronski, Johanna Musfeldt, Matthias Riedel, Carsten Skurk and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Gregor NellesHeart and Vascular Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany. gregor.nelles@web.de.
Youssef S AbdelwahedDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Claudio SeppeltHeart and Vascular Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Denitsa MetevaDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Mukaram RanaHeart and Vascular Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Lena M SeegersHeart and Vascular Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Lara SieronskiDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Johanna MusfeldtDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias RiedelDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Carsten SkurkDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Arash HaghikiaDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Jens KlotscheEpidemiology Und Heath Economy, German Rheumatism Research Center Berlin, and Institute for Social Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Barbara E StähliDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Michael JonerDepartment of Cardiology and ISAResearch Center, German Heart Center, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Ulf LandmesserDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
David M LeistnerHeart and Vascular Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

The study was supported by grants of the Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) and the DZHK FKZ 81Z2100202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-risk plaque features detected by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in culprit lesions (CL) of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Whether the coexistence of multiple high-risk features within the same CL confers additional prognostic impact remains unknown. Within the multicentric, translational OPTICO-ACS study, the CL of 338 ACS-patients undergoing pre-intervention OCT-imaging were screened for the presence of conventional high-risk plaque features. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events plus (MACE +) defined as a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and re-hospitalization for progressive or unstable angina pectoris at two years follow-up. The relationship between each individual and multiple co-occurring high-risk features were comprehensively compared between patients with – and without clinical events. A ruptured fibrous cap [80% vs 51.2%; HR = 1.816 (1.050–3.142); p = 0.033], cholesterol crystals [71.3% vs 53.5%; HR = 1.936 (1.193–3.142); p = 0.008] and a high maximum lipid arc [78.8% vs. 48.2%; HR = 1.947 (1.140–3.328); p = 0.015)] each occurred more frequently in patients with clinical events as compared to patients without clinical events. The co-existence of all three high-risk plaque features (Triple Positive Plaque – TPP) within the same CL showed the strongest association with the primary endpoint (HR = 2.282 (1.462–3.562; p < 0.001). Adding TPP to baseline clinical risk, showed the strongest improvement in prediction accuracy for MACE + , as represented by an improvement in C-statistics of 0.056; p < 0.001. TPP showed the strongest association with the primary endpoint and significantly improved prediction accuracy for MACE + . This finding may support risk stratification after ACS and may justify enhanced secondary preventive measures.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsPlaque, AtheroscleroticTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleFibrosisHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentACSHigh-risk plaqueOptical coherence tomographyVulnerable plaque

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.