Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870752›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026

Encapsulated configuration of a flexible transparent adhesive bolus to improve surface conformity and skin safety in post-mastectomy radiation therapy.

Hideharu Miura, Kenji Kanemoto, Toshiya Okazue, Shuichi Ozawa, Masahiro Kenjo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hideharu MiuraHiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0057, Japan. miura@hiprac.jp.
Kenji KanemotoHiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0057, Japan.
Toshiya OkazueHiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0057, Japan.
Shuichi OzawaHiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0057, Japan.
Masahiro KenjoHiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0057, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the clinical feasibility and surface conformity of ClearFit2-Encapsulated, a technical configuration implemented to facilitate the clinical use of highly adhesive transparent boluses through a film-dressing encapsulation method for post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). ClearFit2 was encapsulated with a thin polyurethane film. Following benchmark phantom comparisons of three bolus configurations (ClearFit1, ClearFit2, and ClearFit2-Encapsulated) using planning CT, clinical performance was evaluated in eight PMRT patients using weekly cone-beam CT (CBCT) to quantify air-gap distances. In phantom evaluation, mean gaps were 3.9 ± 3.1 mm for ClearFit1, 0.9 ± 0.9 mm for ClearFit2, and 2.2 ± 2.2 mm for ClearFit2-Encapsulated. In clinical evaluation, the median air-gap distance across all cases was 1.1 mm (range: 0.6-1.7 mm), with 88.2% of the interface area maintaining gaps ≤ 3 mm. ClearFit2-Encapsulated demonstrates high surface conformity and clinical feasibility, providing a practical bolus-handling solution for patients undergoing PMRT.

Indexed as

AdhesivesMastectomySafetySkinBreast NeoplasmsCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansPhantoms, ImagingPolyurethanesSurface PropertiesAdhesivesPolyurethanesAir‑gap analysisCone‑beam CTMedical adhesive‑related skin injuryPost-mastectomy radiation therapySurface conformity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.