ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026
Experiences and Perceptions of Risk Among Australian Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Engage in Sexual Strangulation.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Why Sexual Choking Is Not as Safe as You Think: A Call to Action from Sex Researchers and Kink Educators.Archives of sexual behavior · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- AssociatedDataset
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sexual strangulation-commonly referred to as "choking"-is a prevalent sexual practice among young people and individuals within the LGBTQ+ community, most prevalent in men who have sex with men. The practice of sexual strangulation is a potentially hazardous behavior that can have numerous deleterious health consequences. In some circumstances, strangulation can result in loss of consciousness, neurological injury, and death. While the health consequences of external pressure on the neck, which restricts blood flow and respiration, are self-evident to medical communities, the same level of knowledge is less common in the broader community. The lack of knowledge around the risks of incorporating strangulation into sexual practices is a public health and sexual health concern. Therefore, it is important to understand the current trends surrounding the perception of risk and the experience of risk in communities where the activity is prevalent, such as men who have sex with men.Through 23 semi-structured interviews, we identified four key themes surrounding the experiences and perceptions of risk among Australian men who have sex with men who engage in sexual strangulation. These include the influences on experience and perception of risk, erroneous estimations surrounding an individual's and partner's competence, a disregard for risk, and the prioritization of enjoyment, harm reduction, and minimization strategies. This article lends valuable insight into the experiences and perceptions of risk in men who have sex with men and engage in strangulation during sexual activity. The article provides suggestions and future implications for medicine and education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.