Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870672›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026

Sacroiliac fixation in pediatric patients: stability analysis by the finite element method.

Heloisa Faggion, Arthur Rossito, Celso Mendonça, Weverley Valenza, Jamil Soni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heloisa FaggionHospital do Trabalhador, Curitiba, Brazil. heloisafaggion@gmail.com.
Arthur RossitoHospital do Trabalhador, Curitiba, Brazil.
Celso MendonçaFederal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Weverley ValenzaHospital do Trabalhador, Curitiba, Brazil.
Jamil SoniHospital do Trabalhador, Curitiba, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate, using the finite element method (FEM), the biomechanical stability of a 3.5 mm cannulated screw for sacroiliac fixation of pelvic fractures in children aged ≤ 5 years.

methodsA computerized pediatric pelvic model was constructed from a CT scan of a 5-year-old patient. A Torode and Zieg Type IV fracture was simulated and fixed with a 3.5 mm cannulated screw positioned in the oblique S1 corridor. A bipedal support load condition was applied. For FEM analysis, two fixations were tested: one with a 3.5 mm screw (test) and another with a 7.0 mm screw (control). Visual and quantitative assessments of bone fragment displacement, total pelvic displacement, and maximum von Mises stress in the screws were performed.

resultsBoth constructs showed minimal fracture displacement and equivalent stability. The maximum von Mises stress in the 3.5 mm screw was 738 MPa, exceeding the steel alloy limits for plastic deformation and tensile strength, producing a small region of increased surface stress.

conclusionIn a FEM-based model, sacroiliac fixation with a 3.5 mm cannulated screw in the oblique S1 safety corridor provided stable fixation of pediatric pelvic fractures up to 5 years of age. Nevertheless, the stress observed could lead to screw failure. Therefore, strict postoperative load restriction is recommended.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BonePelvic BonesSacroiliac JointBiomechanical PhenomenaBone ScrewsChild, PreschoolFinite Element AnalysisHumansStress, MechanicalTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone screwsChildFinite element analysisFracture fixationSacroiliac joint

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.