Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870652›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026

Predicting drug-target interactions and binding affinity using an optimized deep learning approach.

Sheo Kumar, Amritpal Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sheo KumarDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar, Jalandhar, India. sheok.cs.21@nitj.ac.in.
Amritpal SinghDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar, Jalandhar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate prediction of Drug-Target Interactions (DTIs) and Drug-Target Affinity (DTA) is crucial for reducing experimental costs and time, thereby accelerating drug discovery and repurposing efforts. The local biochemical contexts and the global structural dependencies between drugs and their target proteins are often insufficiently captured by conventional deep learning models, which restrict their predictive performance. In this work, we introduce a CNN based Dual Attention (nCNN-DA), which combines 1D convolutional feature extraction with channel and spatial attention mechanisms to enhance the representational power of features for drug SMILES and protein sequences. The model was trained and tested on three benchmark datasets: KIBA, Davis, and BindingDB, using AUPR, AUROC, MSE, Pearson correlation, and accuracy. Experimental results show that nCNN-DA significantly improves performance compared to well-established models (FusionNet, GraphormerDTI, DeepDTAGen, and DTBA-net). In particular, nCNN-DA achieved the best accuracy of 98.5%, 95.5%, and 97.5%, as well as the lowest MSE of 0.1559, 0.3189, and 0.2957 on KIBA, Davis, and BindingDB, respectively, and better scores for AUPR and Pearson Correlation. These findings further demonstrate that nCNN-DA issued for identifying putative DTI pairs and predicting binding affinities with high quality, making it a versatile and general method for drug discovery, virtual screening, and drug repurposing.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug DiscoveryProteinsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsProtein BindingPharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsDeep learning approachDrug target affinityDrug target interactionDual attention mechanismnCNN-DA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.