Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870650›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2026

Do CAD/CAM restorative materials respond differently to coffee thermocycling and simulated toothbrushing?

Irem Sozen Yanik, Dilara Sahin Hazir, Guliz Aktas, M Baris Guncu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irem Sozen YanikDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, 06100, Turkey. iremsozen93@gmail.com.
Dilara Sahin HazirDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, 06100, Turkey.
Guliz AktasDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, 06100, Turkey.
M Baris GuncuDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, 06100, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis laboratory study aimed to investigate the effects of toothbrushing with different toothpaste formulations on the color stability and surface roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials following coffee-staining thermocycling. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 160 specimens were prepared from four restorative materials: IPS e.max CAD, CEREC Tessera, Shofu Block HC, and VITA Enamic (n = 40 each). Following initial measurements, specimens underwent thermocycling in a coffee solution (5000 cycles) to simulate staining. Each group was subsequently divided and brushed with either a whitening toothpaste containing hydrated silica and hydrogen peroxide or a non-whitening toothpaste containing hydrated silica only. A total of 10,000 brushing cycles were performed under standardized conditions. Color stability was assessed using ΔE₀₀ values, and surface roughness was quantified using the Ra parameter at baseline, after thermocycling, and after brushing. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests with the significance threshold set at p < 0.05. SEM analysis was conducted on one randomly selected specimen per group (x1000).

resultsStatistically significant differences in color stability, as assessed by ΔE₀₀ values, were observed among the tested materials (p < 0.001). Resin-based groups, particularly Shofu Block HC, exhibited the greatest reduction in color stability after coffee thermocycling and subsequent brushing (ΔE₀₀ = 1.069, p < 0.001), whereas glass-ceramics (IPS e.max CAD and CEREC Tessera) demonstrated superior color stability (ΔE₀₀ ≤ 0.520). Surface roughness increased significantly in resin-containing materials (VITA Enamic ΔRa = 0.036; Shofu Block HC ΔRa = 0.020) compared with glass-ceramics (p < 0.001). No significant differences were detected between whitening and non-whitening toothpastes for either parameter across all groups (p > 0.05). Ra changes were also concluded by SEM.

conclusionThe performance of restorative materials under staining and mechanical aging stressors is material-dependent. Glass-ceramics displayed superior color stability after coffee exposure and greater resistance to brushing-related surface degradation, whereas resin-containing materials were more vulnerable. The choice of toothpaste formulation did not significantly affect color stability or surface characteristics, suggesting that intrinsic material properties play a more critical role in long-term esthetic outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Selection of restorative materials plays a decisive role in ensuring the long-term esthetic success of dental restorations. Since intrinsic material properties strongly influence color stability and resistance to surface degradation, clinicians should carefully consider material choice during treatment planning to achieve durable and predictable outcomes.

Indexed as

CoffeeComputer-Aided DesignDental MaterialsToothbrushingCeramicsColorComposite ResinsDental PorcelainMaterials TestingMethacrylatesMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningSilicatesSurface PropertiesToothpastesCoffeeComposite ResinsDental MaterialsDental PorcelainMethacrylatesSilicatesToothpastesVITA EnamicCAD/CAM restorative materialsCoffee stainingColor stabilitySurface roughnessToothbrushing abrasion

Identifiers

PMID41870650
PMCPMC13008995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.