Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870623›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026

TachoSil

Claudio Ricci, Vincenzo D'Ambra, Federico Pisani, Laura Alberici, Carlo Ingaldi, Marco Fichera, Riccardo Casadei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claudio RicciDepartment of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC); Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Pancreas Unit, Bologna, 40138, Italy. claudio.ricci6@unibo.it.
Vincenzo D'AmbraDepartment of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC); Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Pancreas Unit, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
Federico PisaniDepartment of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC); Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Pancreas Unit, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
Laura AlbericiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italia.
Carlo IngaldiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italia.
Marco FicheraDepartment of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC); Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Pancreas Unit, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
Riccardo CasadeiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC); Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Pancreas Unit, Bologna, 40138, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a rare but potentially lethal complication after distal pancreatectomy (DP), often precipitated by clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). While the fibrin sealant patch TachoSil® has been evaluated for POPF prevention, its role in mitigating PPH remains underexplored.

methodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing DP (2015–2024). Patients were classified by intraoperative use of TachoSil® in addition to standard stump closure. The primary endpoint was PPH, defined per International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) criteria. Secondary endpoints included clinically relevant POPF, Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), reoperation, 90-day mortality, and length of stay (LOS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for baseline covariates.

resultsOf 224 patients, 56 (25%) received TachoSil®. After IPTW adjustment, TachoSil® was associated with a reduced risk of PPH (RD − 0.065; 95% CI − 0.121 to − 0.009; p = 0.014), corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 15 and an E-value of 6.7. No significant differences were observed for clinically relevant POPF (RD 0.116; p = 0.105), CCI (MD 3.459; p = 0.091), reoperation (RD − 0.016; p = 0.486), 90-day mortality (RD 0.012; p = 0.498), or LOS (MD − 0.242 days; p = 0.856). Stratified analysis showed a pronounced reduction in PPH among patients who developed POPF (RD − 0.180; 95% CI − 0.311 to − 0.048; p = 0.004; NNT = 6; E-value = 12.6), while no significant effect was observed in patients without POPF.

conclusionsTachoSil® use after DP was not associated with lower POPF rates but significantly reduced PPH incidence, particularly in patients developing POPF. These findings support selective TachoSil® application in high-risk patients as part of a targeted strategy to prevent severe hemorrhagic complications after DP.

Indexed as

FibrinogenPancreatectomyPostoperative HemorrhageThrombinAgedDrug CombinationsFemaleHemostaticsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic FistulaPilot ProjectsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesDrug CombinationsFibrinogenHemostaticsTachoSilThrombinabsorbable fibrin sealant patchhemorrhagepancreatic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41870623
PMCPMC13132923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.