ReviewAnnals of hematology2026
Current evidence and strategies for bridging therapy in CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas.
Review in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has markedly improved the prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL). However, disease progression during the manufacturing period remains a major barrier to successful treatment. Bridging therapy (BT), defined as anti-lymphoma treatment administered between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy, serves two primary purposes: to prevent disease progression ensuring eligibility for CAR T-cell infusion, and to modulate the immune microenvironment to potentially enhance CAR T-cell efficacy or mitigate its toxicity. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current strategies and clinical evidence regarding BT in the context of CAR T-cell therapy. We systematically examine the efficacy and safety profiles of various BT strategies, including chemotherapy, targeted or immunotherapy agents, and radiotherapy. Furthermore, we summarize and compare findings from pivotal clinical trials and real-world studies, offering insights into the practical application and outcomes of BT in diverse clinical settings. Unresolved questions remain, including the optimal implementation of bispecific antibodies as BT regimens, the timing and duration of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors administration, the safety and efficacy of reusing polatuzumab vedotin in previously exposed patients, and the standardization of radiotherapy protocols. In conclusion, the rational selection and application of BT strategies hold promise for improving the clinical outcomes of R/R LBCL patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.