Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870570›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Coordination dynamics and speed-related adaptations in forward and backward walking.

Morteza Farivar, Adam C King

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Morteza FarivarDepartment of Kinesiology, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, 76129, USA. morteza.farivar@tcu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1099-9100
Adam C KingDepartment of Kinesiology, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, 76129, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9527-5167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of walking speed and direction on gait coordination dynamics in healthy young adults, focusing on intralimb and interlimb coordination during forward (FW) and backward (BW) walking. Twenty participants walked on a treadmill under six speed conditions in both FW and BW. Kinematic data were collected to compute spatiotemporal gait parameters, continuous relative phase (CRP), and phase coordination index (PCI) as measures of segmental coordination and bilateral timing. Repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to assess the effects of speed independently for each walking direction. In FW, increased walking speed was associated with longer step and stride lengths, reduced double-limb support time, and lower PCI values. Speed-related changes in CRP were swing and stance phase-specific, with more temporally consistent segmental phase relationships at higher speeds. In BW, slower speeds were associated with higher PCI values and greater phase variability, whereas increases in speed were accompanied by modest, phase-specific changes in CRP. Proximal segment couplings (thigh–shank and thigh–pelvis) were especially sensitive to speed manipulation in both walking directions. Overall, walking speed acted as a control parameter that reorganized intralimb and interlimb coordination in a phase-specific manner. These findings highlight the importance of considering both speed and direction when evaluating gait coordination and provide a coordination-dynamics–based framework for future investigations in clinical populations with impaired locomotor control.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalGaitPsychomotor PerformanceWalkingWalking SpeedAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBilateral coordinationContinuous relative phaseGait adaptabilityNeural controlSegment couplingWalking speed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.