ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Coordination dynamics and speed-related adaptations in forward and backward walking.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of walking speed and direction on gait coordination dynamics in healthy young adults, focusing on intralimb and interlimb coordination during forward (FW) and backward (BW) walking. Twenty participants walked on a treadmill under six speed conditions in both FW and BW. Kinematic data were collected to compute spatiotemporal gait parameters, continuous relative phase (CRP), and phase coordination index (PCI) as measures of segmental coordination and bilateral timing. Repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to assess the effects of speed independently for each walking direction. In FW, increased walking speed was associated with longer step and stride lengths, reduced double-limb support time, and lower PCI values. Speed-related changes in CRP were swing and stance phase-specific, with more temporally consistent segmental phase relationships at higher speeds. In BW, slower speeds were associated with higher PCI values and greater phase variability, whereas increases in speed were accompanied by modest, phase-specific changes in CRP. Proximal segment couplings (thigh–shank and thigh–pelvis) were especially sensitive to speed manipulation in both walking directions. Overall, walking speed acted as a control parameter that reorganized intralimb and interlimb coordination in a phase-specific manner. These findings highlight the importance of considering both speed and direction when evaluating gait coordination and provide a coordination-dynamics–based framework for future investigations in clinical populations with impaired locomotor control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41870570What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.