ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Comparative Analysis of Kegel Exercise Knowledge, Application, and Recommendation Between Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation and Nursing Students.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPelvic floor muscle exercises are widely recommended as an evidence-based, noninvasive, and cost-effective approach, particularly for the prevention and management of urinary incontinence. This study was conducted to compare the knowledge levels, application habits and recommendation behaviors of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation and Nursing department students regarding Kegel exercises.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 250 undergraduate students (150 from Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 100 from Nursing) at a Turkish university. Data were collected via a structured questionnaire evaluating students' sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, practice frequency, recommendation behaviors, and perceived effectiveness of Kegel exercises. Group comparisons were analyzed using independent t-tests and chi-square tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsPhysiotherapy and Rehabilitation students showed significantly higher scores in knowledge (p = 0.032), more frequent application (p = 0.008), and greater likelihood of recommending Kegel exercises (p = 0.001). They also reported higher effectiveness and overall engagement (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe findings indicate that Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation students possess higher levels of knowledge, are more likely to apply Kegel exercises themselves, and more frequently recommend them to others compared to Nursing students. This disparity may be attributed to curriculum differences, particularly the greater emphasis on musculoskeletal and pelvic health training within physiotherapy education. Integrating structured pelvic floor muscle training modules into nursing curricula may enhance students' competence and confidence, ultimately contributing to improved pelvic health awareness and patient care outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41870567What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.