ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Deep learning-based identification of aberrant anterior tibial artery on knee MRI: a brazilian multicenter study.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Introduction to the special issue on imaging of the knee.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a deep learning model for the detection of aberrant anterior tibial artery (AATA) on axial T2-weighted knee MRI, given the surgical relevance of unrecognized AATA and the lack of automated detection tools. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 70,260 MRI images from 2315 examinations (1441 without AATA and 874 with AATA) collected after institutional review board approval. Musculoskeletal radiologists performed image-level annotations. Data were split at the patient level into training, validation, and internal test sets; an independent dataset from another institution served as an external test set. A convolutional neural network was implemented in Python and PyTorch. Model performance was assessed at the patient level.
resultsAt the slice level, the model achieved an F1-score of 0.838 on the internal test set. Patient-level classification using the validation-derived threshold (0.17) yielded F1-scores of 0.966 on the validation set, 0.979 on the internal test set, and 0.786 on the external test set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the external cohort was 0.97, indicating strong generalization despite a decrease in precision due to false positives.
conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to apply artificial intelligence for automated detection of AATA on knee MRI. The proposed deep learning model performs this task with high sensitivity. Despite reduced precision in the external cohort, it demonstrates strong potential for enhancing preoperative risk assessment and surgical planning. Broader multicenter validation is warranted before clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.