ArticleTrends in hearing
Visual Implicit Learning and Speech Recognition in Adult Post-Lingual Cochlear Implant Users.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implicit learning is thought to play an important role in speech recognition under challenging conditions. However, auditory deprivation has been proposed to influence implicit learning, including in the visual modality, although evidence in adults with post-lingual deafness is limited. Therefore, we investigated implicit visual learning and its associations with speech recognition in adults with post-lingual deafness who use cochlear implants (CIs). Thus, this study focuses on the effects of late auditory deprivation rather than on the effects of early deprivation associated with congenital deafness. Adult CI users (n = 30) and a group of individuals with normal hearing (NH, n = 36) completed two implicit visual learning tasks (statistical and perceptual), a battery of challenging speech recognition tests and cognitive measures (vocabulary, working memory, attention, and verbal processing speed). NH listeners demonstrated significant visual statistical learning, whereas CI users showed a similar but nonsignificant pattern. In the visual perceptual learning task, both groups exhibited comparable learning effects. In CI users, visual statistical learning contributed to the recognition of speech in noise (words and sentences). Visual perceptual learning only contributed to the recognition of words in noise. The current findings are inconsistent with the idea that auditory deprivation beyond the sensitive period interferes with visual learning. Rather, in CI users, visual implicit learning contributes to the recognition of challenging speech. Therefore, future work might investigate whether visual learning in CI candidates is predictive of postimplantation milestones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.