Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870431›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Workplace Accommodations and Attrition Among Physicians With Disabilities.

Zoie C Sheets, Zakia Nouri, Sarah S Conrad, Christopher J Moreland, Xiaochu Hu, Michael J Dill, Lisa M Meeks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zoie C SheetsDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Zakia NouriAssociation of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.
Sarah S ConradAssociation of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.
Christopher J MorelandDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
Xiaochu HuAssociation of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.
Michael J DillAssociation of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.
Lisa M MeeksDepartment of Medicine Education, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Physicians with disabilities face bias and barriers in the workplace, including stigma, lack of accommodations, and mistreatment, which may contribute to workforce attrition. Given the projected physician shortage and the importance of physicians with disabilities in providing informed and empathetic care, understanding attrition within this group is critical. Objective: To examine the associations among disability, workplace accommodations, and physician workforce attrition, including consideration of leaving medical practice and reductions in clinical hours. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study used a cross-sectional design to analyze data from the 2022 National Sample Survey of Physicians. Logistic regression models assessed associations between disability and attrition outcomes, adjusting for demographic and workplace factors. Participants included 5917 active physicians who self-reported personal (eg, disability status) and professional (eg, accommodations) data. Data were collected from May 10 to November 9, 2022, and analyzed from October 1, 2023, to May 1, 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were (1) having considered leaving medical practice within the past 12 months, including reasons why, and (2) having ever reduced clinical hours for 6 months or longer. The core independent variable was accommodation status. Results: Among the 5917 physicians surveyed, 154 (2.6%) reported having a disability. A total of 3707 respondents (62.6%) were men or transgender men and 5620 (95.0%) identified as heterosexual; the mean (SD) age was 53.9 (10.8) years. Fifty-six physicians with disabilities (36.4%) considered leaving the practice of medicine, compared with 1316 of 5600 physicians (23.5%) without disabilities. Sixty-seven physicians with disabilities (43.5%) reported transitioning to part time or pausing their practice at some point, compared with 1327 (23.7%) without disabilities. Multivariate regression analysis found physicians with disabilities were more likely than their peers without disabilities to consider leaving medical practice (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; 95% CI, 1.24-3.96; P = .01) and to have reduced clinical hours or paused practice during their careers (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.09-3.43; P = .02). Burnout was the most common reason among both groups, and physicians with disabilities more frequently cited underlying health conditions (self or family) (32 [52.7%] vs 122 [8.5%]). Among physicians with disabilities, those who received accommodations were significantly less likely than those without accommodations to report an intent to leave (42 of 123 [34.3%] and 13 of 24 [54.2%], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, physicians with disabilities were significantly more likely to consider leaving the workforce and to reduce clinical hours than their peers without disabilities. Clear, stigma-free disclosure and accommodation processes, along with inclusive workplace cultures, are essential to retaining this vital segment of the physician workforce.

Indexed as

Personnel TurnoverPersons with DisabilitiesPhysiciansWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesWorking Conditions

Identifiers

PMID41870431
PMCPMC13010203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.