ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Network Analysis of Burnout and Safety Competence Among Oncology Nurses: A Secondary Study to Identify Bridge Targets for Precision Interventions.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Network Analysis of Burnout and Safety Competence Among Oncology Nurses: A Secondary Study to Identify Bridge Targets for Precision Interventions.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOccupational burnout poses a persistent threat to nurses' mental health and the quality of patient care. Emerging evidence indicates that burnout is not a uniform phenomenon but manifests in distinct psychological patterns. Yet, how these diverse burnout experiences interact with safety-related factors is insufficiently understood. Network analysis offers a systems-level perspective to uncover interconnections among psychological and safety variables and to pinpoint potential bridge nodes for targeted interventions.
aimThis study sought to map the network architecture linking psychological and safety-related factors among nurses across different burnout profiles, to identify profile-specific central and bridge nodes, and to examine their associations with safety behaviors.
methodsA total of 2092 nurses were included. This study was a secondary analysis based on a previously established dataset in which three distinct burnout profiles were identified using latent profile analysis: the High Achievement Stable Group (Class 1, 70.3%), the High Efficiency Contradictory Group (Class 2, 6.6%), and the High Pressure Adaptive Group (Class 3, 23.1%). Psychological-safety networks were estimated for both the overall sample and each subgroup using the EBICglasso model. Centrality and bridging indices were computed via expected influence and bridge expected influence, followed by network comparison tests to evaluate structural variations across profiles.
resultsIn the overall network, "skills" (B4) exhibited the greatest centrality, whereas "personal accomplishment" (A3) and "knowledge" (B1) consistently functioned as pivotal bridge nodes across profiles. Although bridge configurations differed slightly among classes, A3 and B1 remained the principal connectors integrating psychological and safety communities. Significant structural differences were detected between Classes 2 and 1 (M test, p < 0.001) and between Classes 3 and 1 (M test, p < 0.001; S test, p = 0.002), with pronounced discrepancies in the edge patterns surrounding A3 and B1.
conclusionsThe burnout-safety networks revealed distinct structural configurations across nurse subgroups. Identifying profile-specific bridge nodes offers practical guidance for precision interventions that enhance safety behaviors and foster occupational resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.