ReviewMedicine2026
Minimally invasive treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A narrative review.
Review in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Benign prostatic hyperplasia-related lower urinary tract symptoms are highly prevalent in middle-aged and older men. Compared to traditional transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) aim to provide meaningful symptom relief. This review evaluated the efficacy, safety, and procedural characteristics of 5 representative MISTs: water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), prostatic artery embolization (PAE), temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND), and Aquablation. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed (2018-2023), supplemented by backward citation tracking. Clinical studies reporting International prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), and/or maximum flow rate (Qmax) were included, with higher-level evidence prioritized. Long-term data show that WVTT and PUL provide durable symptom improvement, achieving 48% IPSS reduction and 35% IPSS improvement, respectively, at 5 years. Aquablation has a lower rate of retrograde ejaculation than TURP. Importantly, no new sexual dysfunction has been reported after WVTT or PUL. The long-term retrograde ejaculation rate with iTIND is 4%. Most MISTs can be performed in an outpatient setting under local anesthesia. For prostates >80 cm3, PAE achieved >44% volume reduction. In summary, MISTs offer personalized treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia, though evidence strength varies. Aquablation has the strongest evidence for larger prostates, while WVTT and PUL are guideline-recommended for medium-sized glands. PAE is suitable for older/high-risk patients, and iTIND shows promise but requires more long-term data. Future research should focus on comparative trials to optimize patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.